Editorial policy
These are the rules we follow when we collect facts, write about tools and fix mistakes. They apply to every listing, including our own.
Where facts come from
Facts about a tool come from primary sources: mainly the vendor’s own website, pricing pages and documentation. Third-party lists may help us discover which tools to cover, but they’re never the source of a fact. We also don’t rely on memory or assumptions. If a fact can’t be traced to a page, it doesn’t go in the record.
For every fact, we record:
- Source: the exact page the fact came from, not just the vendor’s homepage
- Date: when the fact was last checked
- Method: how it was collected
- Status: whether it has been confirmed against the source yet
Each tool page shows how complete its record is, what share of it has been confirmed, when it was last updated and when its pricing was last checked.
How we handle unknowns
- If we can’t find or confirm a value, it stays blank and shows as “Unknown” or “—”. We never guess.
- A blank never means “No”. If a tool doesn’t list an API, we show it as unknown, not as “no API”.
- We only record “none” when the vendor explicitly says so, and that statement is sourced like any other fact.
- Fields still waiting on confirmation are counted and flagged on the tool page.
We’re strictest about the details most likely to mislead a buyer: pricing and plans, integrations, security certifications and feature attributes. We never infer these.
Summaries, pros and cons
Each listing includes a one-line summary, a verdict, pros and cons, and notes on who the tool suits. These are written by us and based only on the facts in that tool’s record, not on vendor marketing copy or outside opinions. “Who it suits” is our judgement and is presented as such, not as a vendor claim.
If a record is too thin to support a fair verdict, for example because key features or pricing are unknown, we flag the verdict for review instead of padding it out.
Reviews and ratings
- We only publish reviews we collect ourselves. We never copy star ratings or reviews from other sites.
- We don’t offer gifts, discounts or other rewards in exchange for reviews.
- Until a tool has a real review, its reviews page says so and isn’t submitted to search engines.
Vendor input
Vendors can submit a product or claim a listing to suggest changes, and we welcome it. A vendor’s suggestion is treated like any other source, though. A change goes into the record only when it can be backed by a public page. Vendors don’t get to approve or edit our summaries, pros, cons or verdicts.
Independence
ToolScout is operated by Inventive. Inventive’s product is listed and labelled as operator-owned, and it follows exactly the same sourcing, writing and ranking rules as every other tool. No one can pay to change a listing, a score or a position. See how we make money and how we rate for details.
Keeping records current
Software changes quickly, so every record carries the date it was last updated. Pricing has its own date because it changes most often. If something is out of date, we’d rather mark it unknown than leave a stale value up as if it were current.
Corrections
If you spot a mistake, tell us what’s wrong and, if you can, where the correct information is published. We’ll check it against the source, update the record and refresh its “last updated” date. Corrections are made the same way whether they come from a reader, a vendor or our own reviews.